Thursday, November 26, 2015

Packet of 25 cigarettes to cost more than $40 by 2020 under Labor



The Labor Party has announced a plan which would see a packet of 25 cigarettes cost more than $40 by 2020.

The price rise would stem from gradual increases in the tax on cigarettes continuing beyond 2017, if Labor is elected.

The Opposition said the policy would generate savings of almost $50 billion over the medium term and almost double the rate at which people quit smoking.

"Money that we want to put towards budget consolidation but also towards very important health initiatives," Labor's health spokeswoman, Catherine King, said.

A packet of 25 cigarettes currently costs between $25 and $30.

Ms King said the increase would correspond with advice from the World Health Organisation.

"We have some 2.5 million Australians who continue to smoke and we lose about 15,000 people a year from smoking-related diseases," she said.

"The World Health Organisation will tell us, as our own national tobacco strategy does, that you do need to continue to ramp up the excise on cigarettes if you are going to continue to drive smoking rates down."

Ms King said the increase would bring Australia into line with the excise rates of about 33 other countries.

She acknowledged heavy smokers were some of the poorest people in society and promised more policies to help prevent and deal with smoking addiction.

"We want people to stop, we want more people to give up, we want more people who are in difficult circumstances to give up as well because we know that smoking kills people," she said.

"We'll be making some further announcements about what we might do to assist people, particularly those areas of the population who find it very difficult to give up smoking."

Opposition Leader Bill Shorten said the policy showed the "stark" difference between Labor and the Government.

"Labor wants to reduce the number of people who smoke; Malcolm Turnbull's Liberals want to increase the GST and the cost of everything, including fresh food, school fees and going to the doctor," he said.

Ms King said increasing taxes on fresh food was "regressive from a health point of view".

"When you look at it from a health point of view, it is a retrograde step and it would predominantly hit those on poorer incomes as well."

People in Australia buy Sobranie Black Russian cigarettes online. 

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Low Nicotine Cigarettes Answer To User Dependence


A new study shows that nicotine dependence on cigarettes can be trimmed off in some extent. The researchers show that users that switch to using low nicotine content cigarettes tend to smoke less and may actually stop their smoking habit in the future.

Neal Benowitz, MD stated in his published commentary that by varying the amount of nicotine present in cigarettes or minimizing its content will give the smokers a lesser habit as well as newcomers will be prevented from becoming addicted to smoking. This same principle was applied to the latest study published just this month by Dr Eric Donny. He suggested a strategy to wean off smokers is by decreasing the amount of nicotine in the cigarette.

The study was conducted  for 840 participants and all are heavy smokers. The researchers asked them to report the number of cigarettes they finished a day and compare it to the number that they normally have before the test.

Modified cigarettes were used in the experiment to really assess if the hypothesis is true. The participants were also assessed about their withdrawal syndrome issues and behaviour while the experiment is ongoing. After the experiment, the researchers observed the pattern created by the varying nicotine level showed positive results. The researchers have found out that the  difference between those who smoke cigarettes with higher nicotine level and those who smoke low-nicotine cigarettes have gone down by 25 percent.

The participants who consumed lower levels of nicotine has reported lower symptoms of nicotine dependence, which makes a good case in proving that lower level of nicotine would help weaning off addiction to smoking. The group is looking forward into greater studies on the matter. They also stated that the study is not pointed out in putting a stop in cigarette smoking, rather it's just to show that minimizing the consumption of nicotine is actually healthy for the body.

better way to save money is to buy low-nicotine cigarettes online.

Friday, September 25, 2015

Japan Tobacco May be Interested in Reynolds Subsidiary

Japan Tobacco and Reynolds American Inc. may be in advanced talks for another cigarette-access-for-debt-relief deal, according to an industry analyst and media reports.

The speculation this time, as first reported by Bloomberg News, is that Japan Tobacco is willing to offer $5 billion to buy certain assets of Reynolds subsidiary Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co., which likely includes top-10 cigarette brand Natural American Spirit.

Reynolds declined to comment on the speculation, while Japan Tobacco could not be reached for comment.

Part of the basis for the speculation comes from Reynolds spending $29.25 billion to buy Lorillard Inc., essentially to gain ownership of Newport, the top-selling U.S. menthol brand and No. 2 traditional cigarette.

As part of the megadeal that closed June 12, Reynolds received $7.1 billion from Imperial Tobacco Group Plc for its purchase of four cigarette brands and blu eCigs, as well as $4.7 billion from British American Tobacco Ltd. from buying new Reynolds shares to maintain its 42 percent ownership stake.

During an investors presentation Aug. 3, Andrew Gilchrist, Reynolds’ chief financial officer, said the company’s $17.6 billion on overall long-term debt “is manageable” not only because the company added Newport revenue, but its loans have an average interest rate of 4.5 percent and an average maturity of 12.4 years.

That said, Gilchrist said Reynolds will remain focused on de-leveraging the debt as quickly as possible.

What makes Japan Tobacco an intriguing choice is that the company already has played a key role in Reynolds remaining in existence.

The $25 billion leveraged buyout of Reynolds in 1988-89 left Reynolds with billions in corporate debt that threatened to crush the company. The corporate historic event was detailed in the bestseller “Barbarians at the Gate” and in “Lost Empire: The Fall of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.” by a team of reporters from the Winston-Salem Journal.

Reynolds officials, dealing with that reality, decided in 1998-99 to sell the international rights to its cigarette brands to Japan Tobacco for $8 billion. That deal significantly eased Reynolds’ debt burden from $6.5 billion to $1 billion and provided better cash flow.

However, with that move, Reynolds essentially conceded any global foothold.

Wells Fargo Securities analyst Bonnie Herzog said that if Reynolds were to sell some of its Santa Fe assets, it would be “a win-win scenario” for the company.

“Based on our sum-of-the-parts analysis, we believe Santa Fe is worth $7.6 billion,” Herzog said. Herzog suggested in 2014 that Reynolds might consider selling Santa Fe to help pay for the Lorillard deal.

On Aug. 27, the Food and Drug Administration sent warning letters to Santa Fe, saying that advertising traditional cigarette products as “additive free” or “natural” is in violation of federal regulations.

Santa Fe emphasized the additive-free element of Natural American when it launched the cigarette in 1982, well before Reynolds bought the company for $340 million in December 2001.


Japan Tobacco is the maker of slim premium cigarettes. Buy Glamour Super Slims Azure online.

Friday, July 17, 2015

Reynolds Starts ad Campaign for American Spirit



A Reynolds American Inc. subsidiary has launched a new national magazine advertising campaign for its premium Natural American Spirit cigarette brand.

The full-page ads will appear in such magazines as Sports Illustrated, Time, Field and Stream, Southern Living, Architectural Digest, Vanity Fair and US Weekly.

“The aim is to drive brand awareness, highlight Natural American Spirit’s 100 percent additive-free natural tobacco proposition, and generate trial among adult smokers,” Seth Moskowitz, spokesman for Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co., said Monday.

Natural American Spirit has climbed into the top-10 U.S. brands with a 1.8 percent market share, benefiting in part from its national advertising not being put on hiatus in recent years.

In May 2013, Reynolds ended a 5½-year voluntary advertising moratorium on its major cigarette brands with its Camel Crush style. It also has run national ads for Camel snus, which are pitched for use in places where smoking is prohibited.

Those national ads with the iconic Camel drew criticism from five anti-tobacco advocacy groups, which asked the attorneys general of Missouri and South Dakota to investigate whether Reynolds was in violation of the 1998 landmark Master Settlement Agreement. Part of the agreement prohibits or limits the ability of tobacco manufacturers to advertise their products in publications that target a teenage audience.

The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids declined comment Monday on the Natural American Spirit campaign.

Reynolds has said the company believes the cigarette and snus ads “are in full compliance” with the MSA.

“We review readership data and analyze the editorial content of the publications over time to be sure the topics covered have a predominant adult appeal and focus, and only advertise in magazines that have adult readership of 85 percent or higher,” Reynolds said in a statement,.

Other brands by Reynolds are Camel, Pall Mall, Winston. Looking to buy Camel Fliters online? Visit dotcigarettes.com.

Friday, June 26, 2015

Dartmouth Crossing Costco to Stop Selling Tobacco Products



Costco’s Dartmouth Crossing location has announced it is quitting tobacco products.

The store posted a notice to customers saying it will stop selling tobacco products after August 31.

The news is getting a mixed reaction from Costco customers, some of whom didn’t know the measure had been announced.

Costco declined to comment after its Dartmouth Crossing location announced it will no longer sell tobacco products.

“I didn't even know they had cigarettes, to tell you the truth,” said shopper Lewis MacDonald.

“I never did buy them with Costco anyways,” remarked shopper Colleen Boudreau.

The announcement is welcome news to the Nova Scotia Lung Association.

“Anything we can do to decrease the access to tobacco in this province is positive as far as the Lung Association is concerned,” said Louis Brill, the association’s CEO.

“The reason is irrelevant to me. It’s just the decrease in access,” he said.

Costco is not revealing the reason for the decision.

A spokesperson at Costco’s Ottawa headquarters declined to comment, saying the company does not do interviews.

In its notice to customers, the Dartmouth Crossing location did say it’s not quitting cold turkey.

Cigarette orders will still be available for pickup at Costco’s Bayers Lake store.

Jennifer Heatley, tobacco control co-ordinator with the province’s Department of Health and Wellness, says anything to reduce access to tobacco is a positive step.

“Reduced access and availability is a key contributor to reducing smoking,” Heatley said.

She said Nova Scotians have been finding reasons to quit.

“Right now we're at about 19 per cent smoking rate, which is down from around 30 per cent in 1999,” she said.

That puts Nova Scotia roughly in the middle of the pack nationally, she said.

Smokers living in Costco should not get upset, they may buy their favorite cigarettes online from a reliable store http://cigarettes-for-beginners.wikidot.com/where-to-buy-cigarettes

Friday, June 5, 2015

Will Saskatchewan Ban Sale of Menthol Cigarettes?


 “Out of 15 to 19 year olds in Saskatchewan, 20 per cent smoke,” said Saskatchewan Lung Association health promotion vice-president Jennifer Miller.

That’s one of the highest smoking rates among youth in the country.

“If we look at the last three years the Canadian numbers have gone down about three per cent but in Saskatchewan we’ve only gone down just over one per cent,” said Miller.

Sunday marked World No Tobacco Day and the day Alberta became the latest province to take menthol tobacco products off the shelves, snuffing them out at the end of September. This comes as most flavoured tobacco products are also being pulled.

“The most important thing is that we help protect the health of Albertans and particular our youth, the research was really clear that this step needed to be taken to do so,” said Alberta Health Minister Sarah Hoffman in Edmonton on Sunday.

“There’s a misperception that youth don’t use menthol products but what we know is that it’s actually the flavour of choice for youth,” said Miller.

Nova Scotia set the bar removing flavoured tobacco and menthol Sunday. Other provinces are moving in that same direction.

The Saskatchewan Lung Association feels the Saskatchewan government should also ‘butt out.’

“We don’t have to open up legislation for this … it’s a simple regulation, they have the regulatory authority to make this change and they need to step up, we’re really being tired of being the last province to be doing this,” said Miller.

The provincial government says it is committed to reducing tobacco use in Saskatchewan, especially when it comes to youth and is working on a provincial reduction strategy. It’s also monitoring Health Canada’s approach to the federal government’s Tobacco Control Act.

A bill was passed in Manitoba Monday to regulate electronic cigarettes and in Quebec, three tobacco companies have been ordered to pay $15 billion in damages an historic class action lawsuit.

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

Five Cigarette Companies Among Armenia's Top 20 Taxpayers



Two of the largest cigarette producers in Armenia are Grand Tobacco and International Masis Tabac.

In the first quarter of this year Grand Tobacco paid 2.528 billion (US$ 5.261 million) in taxes, up from 1.733 billion AMD in the same period last year.

International Masis paid 1.374 billion AMD (US$2.859 million) in the first quarter of this year, up from 1.287 billion AMD last year.

Masis Tobacco, another cigarette producer owned by Grand Holding, paid 120.8 million AMD in taxes, 320 million less than last year.

Cigarette production in Armenia is taking off. According to the National Statistical Service, 2,891,000 cigarettes were produced in Armenia in the first quarter of 2015 – up 28.4% over the same period last year.

Since the above companies export 80% of their product, it’s safe to assume that their exports have also grown. But we still have no raw data from the customs service in Armenia.

Of the three companies, Grand Tobacco enjoys the lion share of the cigarette market - 50.8% of filter cigarette production and 92.3% of non-filtered varieties.

Cigarette imports have dropped. In 2014, Armenia imported US$44.6 million worth of cigarettes; down $16.8 million from 2013.

Overall, five companies in the cigarette business were ranked in the top 20 taxpayers in Armenia for the 1st quarter of 2015: Grand Tobacco (7th), JTI Armenia (11th), International Masis Tabac (13th), Avers (14th), and Philip Morris (15th). However, today many people prefer to buy cigarettes online at lowest prices in order to receive cigarettes right at their home.

Thursday, April 30, 2015

Bid to Ban Smoking in Cars with Kids Fails


 The Illinois Senate snuffed out a proposal Wednesday to ban smoking in cars with kids.

The measure, designed to limit exposure to second-hand smoke, received just eight "yes" votes out of a possible 59 in the Legislature's upper chamber.

Opponents said it was ironic the proposed law was being discussed at the same time the state is moving to decriminalize marijuana.

The sponsor of the measure, state Sen. Ira Silverstein, D-Chicago, said he was merely trying to protect children.

"When you're in a car you're in a confined area," Silverstein said.

Under the proposal, police could not stop a vehicle solely because the driver is seen smoking with kids in the car. The stop would have to involve some other traffic violation.

The law also wouldn't have applied to people driving convertibles.

The legislation is Senate Bill 729.

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Should Feds Ban Menthol-Flavoured Tobacco?



As the federal government tries to crack down on flavoured-tobacco products, including little cigars, ostensibly targeted to youth, there’s an ongoing tug-of-war over the menthol equivalent. Back in 2010, Ottawa banned flavours said to appeal to teens, such as cherry and grape, from tobacco products that weigh less than 1.4 grams. But that didn’t change much: according to Health Canada, the industry got around the ban, in part by simply selling larger cherry- and grape-flavoured products.

Ottawa moved to close that loophole and introduced rules last month. If they’re adopted by the summer, all larger fruity-flavoured tobacco products will be verboten. But neither ban includes menthol cigarettes. And even though youth smoking rates are at a record low 7 per cent, anti-smoking advocate Les Hagen says excluding menthol is still a mistake.

Hagen points to a study from the Propel institute for Population Health that found a third of all Canadian teens have tried menthol in the last 30 days.

“This information has come out within the last few years, but unfortunately it’s not getting the attention it deserves,” Hagen said. “If the goal of this legislation is to discourage young people from using tobacco products – it should start with a ban on menthol.” That data convinced Ontario’s Associate Minister of Health to include a ban on menthol in that province’s legislation.

“The evidence shows that those who smoke menthol cigarettes tend to smoke more and that it’s harder to give up smoking if you’re a menthol smoker,” Associate Minister of Health Dipika Damerla said But Alex Scholten, President of the Canadian Convenience Stores Association, says the data is being cherry-picked.

“The Propel studies show that in 2010 – 2011, 5% of students in grades 10-12 had smoked a menthol product in the last 30 days. In 2012-2013, the Propel studies showed this number had actually gone down to 4%,” Scholten said, adding “No one is focusing on that – instead they are pushing for outright bans which are not justified by the downward trending rates of youth tobacco consumption.”

Scholten says the effects of a ban are overstated, especially retailers are already legally required to ask for ID and keep cigarettes behind display bins. Banning a particular product “takes it out of that controlled environment and puts it into contraband circles, where you’re not going to see age-testing, taxation’s not going to be done … the product is not sold behind display bins – it’s sold in smoke shacks or on the street by criminal organizations,” Scholten said.

Scholten points to RCMP data showing an increase of nearly 800 per cent in contraband mini-cigar seizures after the federal government first banned them in 2009. Health Canada said it couldn’t comment on the industry’s claims, but did say it sees a need for the new rules around flavoured tobacco.

Monday, March 23, 2015

1 in 5 Americans Still Smoke


More than 50 years after the first U.S. surgeon general's report on its dangers, smoking remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the United States. And almost three out of four of those in this country who still smoke say they want to quit, so they know the consequences.

The good news is that because so many did quit, smoking, at least in the United States, has been in decline. Robert Proctor, professor of the history of science at Stanford University, said cigarette smoking continued to grow throughout the 1960s and 1970s, reaching a peak of about 630 billion cigarettes, or more than 31 billion packs, smoked annually in the United States before the start of its decline in 1982.

The 1964 surgeon general's report set off one of the most powerful public health efforts ever, dramatically cutting the number of smokers. But tobacco products still pose significant risks to the health of Americans, and while the number of smokers in the U.S. has significantly declined, for every American smoker who has quit, the global rate of smoking has increased, said Allan Brandt, a professor at Harvard Medical School.

Within months of the 1964 report, the Federal Trade Commission ordered cigarette companies to put warning labels on packaging, and in 1969, cigarette advertising was banned from television and radio. Since then, according to the surgeon general's office, adult smoking rates have been cut in half.

Erika Sward, of the American Lung Association, said that those who are most likely to smoke today generally are the less educated of a lower socioeconomic status. Targets of aggressive tobacco company marketing campaigns are the poor, the needy, the impaired, the vulnerable, those who are unable to quit, and children, she added.

"People who still smoke," Proctor said, "are those who have lost the freedom not to." He added that Hollywood still depicts smoking as glamorous, accounting for about one third of new smokers.

The tobacco industry, according to Proctor, clearly knew by the mid-1950s that cigarettes were dangerous, and the surgeon general's office charged that it deliberately misled the public about the risks.

The evolving tobacco market offers little comfort. A spokesman for the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston confirmed that all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes and hookahs, contain highly addictive levels of the chemical nicotine. Thus the tobacco habit hangs on.

Friday, February 20, 2015

New York Bars Where You Can Still Have a Smoke



Bars would close up shop, owners said. No one would come to a restaurant if they couldn't smoke in peace after a belly-filling meal. Sure, the world would be safe for the pink-lunged, white-toothed and long-of-breathed. But what about the smokers — this author included — who wanted to blacken our lungs inside, at the bar, while pickling our livers, too?

Rumors of the death of New York City nightlife were, one can safely say, greatly exaggerated. Smokers learned to simply step outside, where the elements drew them together into ever tighter, more defiant knots.

But when the ban was still being contemplated, the authorities made a concession to allay the fears some business owners had. Any bar able to demonstrate that, as of the end of 2002, more than 10 percent of its gross revenue came from the sale of tobacco products could get a special waiver from the law. As long as they didn't significantly expand or change locations, they would be little oases of smoke in a nauseatingly fresh-smelling city.

It's been nearly twelve years since the ban went into effect, but eight of those officially sanctioned smoking bars still exist, according to the city's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. They are glorious throwbacks to an earlier time, one with considerably more mucus and nasty brown boogers. Often unknown, even to smokers, the places carry a whiff of the illicit and the underground. Smoke-easies, if you will.

On a recent Saturday, one of those bars, Karma Lounge, on Second Avenue in the East Village, hosted a few smokers, bellied up at the bar. As snow fell outside, they puffed happily away.

The majority of the smoking bars remaining in New York are pretty smoking-forward. They're cigar bars, for the most part, with fancy humidors and the like, the kind of place you might expect to see Michael Bloomberg puffing a stogie and sipping a neat scotch that costs as much as your rent. Karma, however, is not that kind of place. It is a dive bar of the most lovable variety, with reasonably priced drinks, a friendly crowd, and ample burn marks on most available surfaces.

As one might imagine, Karma attracts its share of regulars, like Jarlath Mullahy, 40, a Dublin native and carpenter. He's here about once a week, he says. He didn't seek out the bar because of its smoking policy — he used to live around the corner and it was a regular haunt for him years ago. But he does make the trip pretty regularly, even now that he lives in Bushwick. Why does he come here, one might ask, knowing full well the answer?

"I don't know why, because I hate the fucking smell of it in my clothes," Mullahy says, with a chuckle. At home, he and his wife both smoke outside, and non-smoking bars, he says, keep him from smoking too much in one sitting. But, he says conspiratorially, "I'll tell you when it's nice — after a hard day's work, when you need a cigarette and a drink?" He claps his hands together and gestures at the bar. "Bob's your uncle."

A former Indian restaurant, Karma has the décor to match, with fringed fabric covering the doorways and dreamy red lighting. (It also has a formidable air filtration system, so it's not nearly as smoky as one might expect.) Late-Nineties-era Blackalicious is on the radio. Small tables host hookah pipes, an alternative smoke that a significant portion of the clientele prefers.

Todd McGovern, 53, a freelance writer and radio producer nursing a cigar and a drink, says he happened upon Karma just a few weeks ago. The bar doesn't do much to let people know that smoking is permitted, and he was wandering the neighborhood with a friend when they discovered the place. He says he enjoys smoking cigars here, partly because he thinks people find cigar smoke particularly objectionable, even outdoors. It's a bit of a haven; people won't bug him here.

Bartender David Machado, 35, a smoker himself, says most of the time the smoke doesn't bother him. If he's being honest, the sickly-sweet hookah fumes — he often lights them for patrons — are even less appealing than the tobacco. And while the bar puts a note on its outdoor sandwich board letting potential customers know that smoking is permitted, Machado doesn't think their unusual privilege is a huge draw, except for regulars who are in the know.

"A lot of people come in, and they're like, wait, you can smoke in here?" Machado says. "And I do know for a fact that it turns some people off." He occasionally sees parties do a U-turn at the door.

You might expect the denizens of a bar like Karma to be fiercely against the smoking ban, plotting some kind of insurrection. But while McGovern says he was wary of the ban at first — "I kind of felt like, well, if you can't smoke in a bar, where can you smoke?" — he has come around in the years since. It's no fun, he says, hanging out in a hazy bar all night.

"It's nice going to places and not having your clothes reeking of cigarette smoke," McGovern says. "People seem to have adjusted to it pretty quickly."

Machado also supports the ban, which he believes was justified, in large part, as a worker protection measure. In the old days, bartenders, servers, and other employees were forced to inhale secondhand smoke for hours on end, with all the attendant health risks that came with it. Machado says those protections were a good idea. And today, especially with a dwindling number of smoking-permitted bars, he feels like he's making an informed choice.

"I know what I'm getting into when I smoke," Machado says. "But other people who were around smoke, that's something they didn't sign up for." And besides, the ban has come with ancillary benefits. If he's out at other bars, stepping out for a cigarette can be a handy thing. "It's a good excuse to get out of awkward conversations," he says.

Mullahy feels the same way. "I've met more people because of the ban," he says. There's a certain camaraderie when you're huddled with a group of strangers, in the cold, for the sake of a habit that was never wise, and seems particularly ill-advised in the dead of winter.

"You stand outside having a menthol cigarette and it becomes a common field," Mullahy says. "You're all in the same rut."

Friday, February 13, 2015

In Ireland a Pack of Cigarettes is €10


 Irish Finance Minister Michael Noonan increased the price of a packet of cigarettes by 40 cent.

The price increase came into effect last fall.

However,  workers earning less than €12,000 are exempt from the Universal Service Charge under other plans which were announced by Minister for Finance Michael Noonan.

The new move was expected to boost lower and middle income earners.

Informed sources said that the only tax hike planned was the price of a packet of cigarettes as the Government attempted to put a few extra euro into the pockets of hard pressed families.

Therefore there was be no alcohol tax increases.

In these conditions people are asking "Where to buy cigarettes?" Well, today there are cheaper in online stores rather than in regular ones.

The total cost of Budget 2015, including tax measures and spending, is €800m to €900m.

A range of other measure have already been leaked including a drop in the top level of taxation from 41pc to 40pc.

The budget also includes plans for more teachers and gardai while there will also be tax relief on the water charges.

A sweetener for the ‘grey vote’ is also on the cards including €100 off water bills for most pensioners.

The Government is expected to announce a three-year road map for the first time today.

Friday, February 6, 2015

Bill to restore smoking in Nebraska cigar bars makes it out of committee

Cigar smokers moved a step closer to again being able to light up in specially licensed bars.

The Legislature’s General Affairs Committee voted Wednesday to advance a bill making exceptions to the statewide smoking ban on cigars and little cigar use in bars.

Legislative Bill 118, sponsored by State Sen. Tyson Larson of O’Neill, responds to a Nebraska Supreme Court ruling last year that snuffed out smoking in both types of places.

The court ruled last summer that the cigar bar and tobacco retail outlet exemptions amounted to unconstitutional special legislation. The ruling did not take effect until earlier this month, after the court rejected the state’s request for a rehearing in the case.

Larson said he has checked with a constitutional law expert and believes the new bill would withstand a legal challenge, if one were to be brought.

LB 118 adds language further spelling out legislative intent about cigar bars, which it calls cigar shops. Intent language about tobacco retail outlets was included in an amendment approved by the committee.

The bill as amended says that allowing smoking in cigar shops and tobacco retail outlets would not interfere with the goals of protecting the public and employees from second-hand smoke.

It said employees have “ample other opportunities for similar employment” and the public should expect second-hand smoke in a cigar shop and could choose to avoid such exposure.

Committee members voted 7-0 to advance the bill, with Sen. Merv Riepe of Omaha abstaining. He said he was concerned that the bill needed more legal review, given the high court ruling.

Under LB 118, as under the previous law, only cigar and pipe smoking would be allowed in cigar bars.

The bill differentiates cigars and pipes from cigarettes by saying that cigar lovers often pair cigars with various types of alcohol and that cigar and pipe smokers may take an hour or more to enjoy their smoking “rather than simply satisfying an addiction.”

The bars would have to meet special standards, including receiving 10 percent or more of gross revenue from cigar and pipe tobacco sales and having a walk-in humidor.

All types of tobacco products could be smoked in tobacco retail outlets, which are defined to include only tobacco specialty shops.

LB 118 could come up for debate by the full Legislature as early as next week.

Friday, January 30, 2015

Cigar-smoking ban takes effect Thursday

Looking to enjoy a little cigar with your old fashioned in downtown Lincoln? Too late.

Nebraska's long-awaited cigar-smoking ban is in effect as of Thursday, according to a message Jake’s Cigars & Spirits posted to its Facebook page Wednesday afternoon.

The change comes after an Aug. 29 Nebraska Supreme Court decision that effectively banned the practice. Nebraska’s 11 cigar bars had previously operated under an exception to the court’s 2008 ban on indoor smoking.

State Sen. Tyson Larson of O’Neill is sponsoring a bill that would allow cigar smoking to continue in bars such as Jake’s. The hearing for his bill will take place Monday.

In a November Daily Nebraskan article, Jake’s manager Jason “Hutch” Hutchison said the loss of indoor smoking wouldn’t “be as bad as people think” for the bar.

“We’ve rolled with the punches for 15 years,” he said. “There’s been times when things were really thin, and now things are really booming.”

Buy Captain Black Little Cigars at http://www.dotcigarettes.com/captain-black

Friday, January 23, 2015

New Orleans Bans Smoking in Bars and Casinos

The Big Easy becomes one of the last major American cities to pass a sweeping smoking ban

The New Orleans City Council unanimously passed a ban on smoking in bars and gambling halls on Thursday. The law is applied to cigarettes, cigars, little cigars, pipes.

The law will take effect in about three months, the Associated Press reports. While owners of bars and casinos expressed concerns that the ban would hurt business, city officials decided the health of musicians and others exposed to secondhand smoke while working in those establishments is paramount.

New Orleans, a major tourism hub known for its nightlife, is one of the last major American cities to allow people to smoke in bars. Logan Gaskill, a lawyer for a large casino next to the French Quarter, estimated at the meeting that revenues would decline 20% as a result from the ban, the AP reports.

But lawmakers were convinced by a teary speech from Councilman James Gray II, who read off the names of people he knew who died from lung-cancer. Another member, Jason Williams, said they had an obligation to protect “the heart and soul” of New Orleans, the musicians and barroom workers.

Friday, January 2, 2015

Smoking restrictions kick in January 1

There will be fewer places for smokers to light up come the new year. New Ontario regulations that ban smoking on all bar and restaurant patios take effect Jan. 1.

At the same time, the province is prohibiting smoking on or around playgrounds and publicly-owned sports fields. The Ontario government will also no longer allow tobacco to be sold on university and college campuses.

“These changes are to protect kids and youth from accessing tobacco products and the harmful effects of smoking, and to protect the people of Ontario from exposure to tobacco use,” said Andrew Robertson, a spokesman for Associate Health Minister Dipika Damerla. “Making smoking less visible will make it seem less socially acceptable to kids and can reduce the likelihood that they start smoking.”

The vast majority of Ontario residents support banning smoking on playgrounds and sports fields, he added. Sixty-five municipalities have already invoked bylaws to shelter kids on playgrounds from second-hand smoke, while 60 municipalities ban it on sports fields. The new Ontario-wide regulation means all children will get these protections, he said.

Under the new rules, there will be no smoking around basketball and soccer courts, ice rinks, tennis courts, splash pads and swimming pools owned by a municipality, province or a post-secondary institution.

Children’s playgrounds at motels, hotels and inns are also included in the smoking ban. Anti-tobacco activists heralded the changes as a positive step forward for people’s health.

At least one restaurant industry spokesman warned that customers will now move on to sidewalks for a puff, exposing passersby to secondhand smoke. Robertson said the current tobacco law prohibits smoking on covered bar and restaurant patios, but the new regulation extends to those that are completely open to the air.

“Evidence shows that nearly 70% of people in Ontario want completely smoke-free patios,” Robertson said. “People can still be exposed to second-hand smoke on patios, even uncovered patios, and this regulation will reduce people’s exposure to second-hand smoke, including children and youth.”

Some of the more controversial measures are still to come. Ontario intends to ban the sale of flavoured tobacco, including the popular menthol brands, within a few years.

One group has warned that adult smokers who like menthol will turn to contraband tobacco suppliers for their fix. NDP MPP France Gelinas, who has pushed hard for a ban on flavoured tobacco, said that these products are developed specifically to create a new generation of young smokers.

Friday, October 24, 2014

Slim cigarette smokers not exposed to more harmful chemicals

A new study confirms that the exposure to tar tended to be lower for smokers of slim cigarettes than of regular cigarettes. Similarly, exposure to nicotine tended to be lower.

Slim cigarettes are an increasingly popular type of cigarette in several countries around the world. Previous studies have shown that the levels of certain toxic chemicals in the smoke of these cigarettes are lower than those in regular cigarettes. However, because lower levels of chemicals in the smoke are not necessarily linked to a reduced exposure to harmful chemicals, concerns had been raised about whether or not smokers of these cigarettes are at a greater health risk than those who smoke regular cigarettes.

To determine the chemical exposure to smokers of slim cigarettes, scientists at British American Tobacco conducted a study in Russia, where slim cigarettes are popular. The study group contained 360 smokers of regular and slim cigarettes and their exposure to tar and nicotine were measured. This was done using a cutting-edge technique that involves measuring levels of chemicals in the smokers' used cigarette filters.

These findings tally with measurements made using high-tech smoking machines, which showed reductions in the levels of a number of chemicals in the smoke including carbon monoxide, acetaldehyde, nitric oxide, acrylonitrile and benzene.

Lead Scientist Madeleine Ashley says that differences in the size of the puffs that the smokers of slim cigarettes took may explain the lower exposure to tar and nicotine. Ashley further stated that 'this is likely to be due to the reduced circumference of slim cigarettes, making it harder to draw on.'

Ian Fearon, Principal Scientist at British American Tobacco, added: 'More studies measuring the levels of smoke chemicals in the blood of smokers are needed to fully understand the exposure of people who smoke slim cigarettes. However, we can assume, based on our current findings, that smokers of slim cigarettes are at no greater risk of exposure to smoke chemicals than regular cigarette smokers. Further work would be needed to assess how this relates to a smoker's health risk.'

Friday, October 3, 2014

As Georgia colleges ban tobacco, some schools still considering options

As 31 Georgia universities adopt a ban on all tobacco products, colleges in and near Augusta support the measure but students remain unsure the bans will stop smoking on campus. All colleges that are part of the University System of Georgia went smoke-free on Wednesday, banning all tobacco-related products from their campuses. The ban, which includes e-cigarettes, hookahs and “all forms of smokeless tobacco,” will prevent anyone from using tobacco products while on campus property, according to the university system’s tobacco policy page. However, smokers may continue to buy cigarettes online.

Visitors who violate the policy could be asked to leave campus, and students that continue to use products despite the ban could be sanctioned under the school’s Student Code of Conduct. Many colleges are readying “smoke cessation” programs designed to help students, staff and faculty members quit smoking. About 1,500 colleges nationwide have adopted smoke-free policies, according to the Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights organization.

Campuses in the Augusta area that already have similar programs in place said the bans are a step in the right direction. Georgia Regents University’s medical college and Summerville campus have adhered to smoking and tobacco product bans for several years. The medical college banned smoking in 2007, and when GRU consolidated in 2013, all campuses agreed to adopt an updated tobacco product policy, which included a ban on e-cigarettes.

Director of Cancer Information and Awareness Christine O’Meara, who worked on a committee to help create the system’s new tobacco product policy, said the college’s ban protected students, faculty and staff from health problems later in life.

“It’s important for everyone here to have a healthy environment to work and study in. Our North Star is promoting health and preventing disability and death, which tobacco products cause,” O’Meara said. “Working to promote these bans helps establish a good example for future public health officials to follow, which is something we definitely want our students to see.”

O’Meara said the next step for the campus’s tobacco product ban is complete compliance. While “a large part of the student population” supports the ban, according to school surveys, there are small percentages of students who still use tobacco on the school campus.

“It’s a cultural change for the Summerville campus. And change of that nature can come very slowly,” O’Meara said. “But we are working to educate our students and faculty about the policy. We will be showing videos to our population here on how to approach people kindly and inform them about the campus’s policies.”

GRU campuses do not use a fine levying system. Instead, they use students and faculty members to voluntarily approach those violating the ban and inform them of the school’s tobacco policy. If an individual refuses, students can call public safety or the college’s “compliance hotline” to report them.

For the University of South Carolina Aiken campus, which does not have a tobacco ban in place yet, the bans are an example to follow.
USC Aiken Chancellor Sandra Jordan said the campus currently restricts where students can smoke, and is exploring a complete tobacco ban as part of a healthy lifestyle initiative, planned to go into effect in the fall of 2015. Jordan said the “vast majority” of students want tobacco bans in place at the school.

“We’ve sent out surveys to our student population, and around 75 to 78 percent of survey takers think a ban would help improve their lives on campus, so we know our population wants it to happen here. We’ve also found that those who smoke on campus started their habit during their freshman or sophomore year. That’s not a culture we want,” Jordan said. “In order to foster healthy lifestyles among our students, a tobacco product ban is very important to have.”

Jordan said she “applauded” Georgia colleges for adopting tobacco bans, saying it placed them “in the vanguard” of colleges hoping to improve their students’ lives. “It’s a forward looking approach,” Jordan said. “Most universities are on track for putting bans like this in place over the next five years, according to what I’ve heard. This means that Georgia is really making gains ahead of other colleges.”

While many students at USC Aiken feel the ban could be beneficial to the campus, some are skeptical of how well the ban will be enforced. “It’s definitely good overall for students’ health, especially considering secondhand smoke,” 18-year-old Rina Lowder said. “But I’m not sure the ban could be really enforced or be fair to those that do smoke. I don’t know if it will really encourage anyone to quit.”

Friday, September 19, 2014

Park commission wants to ban smoking at 77 Ann Arbor parks

Want to light up at an Ann Arbor park or playground? Think again. The Parks Advisory Commission is trying to turn 77 parks into smoke-free zones.

The PAC looked at other cities with similar bans and consulted with a public health expert before sending their recommendation to Ann Arbor's city administrator, Steve Powers. He is the one who has the power to approve it.

Some didn't like the idea.

“I come here and smoke at Liberty Plaza every morning," said Ann Arbor resident Vittorio Riley. “This is how I start my day before I go to work. It’s a public place, open air and not close to businesses. How can it be banned?”

Others were in support.

“I have a child and I think it’s great idea for parks with playgrounds,” said Nicole Minney. “No one wants to breathe in that secondhand smoke and I wouldn’t have to tell my child, 'OK, let’s move over here.'"

The Ann Arbor City Council already approved an ordinance this year that bans smoking near bus stops and store fronts.

Local 4 reached out to Powers, who is out of town, and he responded with this statement: “I will be receiving the Parks Advisory Committee's recommendations in the next few days. I will then review the recommendations and decide on implementation using city council's policy direction and PAC's work.”

There are 158 parks total in Ann Arbor. The ban would apply to 73 parks with playgrounds and four others. The PAC would monitor the effectiveness before recommending the ban at all parks.

This is the list from PAC for the potentially smoke-free parks:

City of Ann Arbor parks with playgrounds

1. Allmendinger Park
2. Arbor Oaks Park
3. Bader Park
4. Baxter Park
5. Beckley Park
6. Belize Park
7. Bromley Park
8. Brookside Park
9. Bryant Community Center
10. Buhr Park
11. Burns Park
12. Burr Oak Park
13. Churchill Downs Park
14. Clinton Park
15. Cloverdale Park
16. Cranbrook Park
17. Creal Park
18. Ellsworth Park
19. Esch Park
20. Evergreen Park
21. Foxfire North Park
22. Frisinger Park
23. Fritz Park
24. Fuller Park
25. Gallup Park
26. Garden Homes Park
27. Glacier Highlands Park
28. Greenbrier Park
29. Hansen Nature Area
30. Hunt Park
31. Huron Highlands Park
32. Island Park
33. Kelly Park
34. Kilburn Park
35. Landsdowne Park
36. Las Vegas Park
37. Leslie Park
38. Longshore Park
39. Mary Beth Doyle Park
40. Maryfield Wildwood Park
41. Meadowbrook Park
42. Mixtwood Pomona Park
43. Mushroom Park
44. North Main Park
45. Northside Park
46. Olson Park
47. Pilgrim Park
48. Placid Way Park
49. Plymouth Parkway Park
50. Riverside Park
51. Rose Park
52. Rose White Park
53. Scheffler Park
54. South Maple Park
55. SouthEast Area Park
56. Sugarbush Park
57. Sylvan Park
58. The Ponds
59. Turnberry Park
60. Veterans Memorial Park
61. Virginia Park
62. Ward Park
63. Waterworks Park
64. Waymarket Park
65. Wellington Park
66. West Park
67. Wheeler Park
68. White Oak Park
69. Winchell Park
70. Windemere Park
71. Winewood Thaler Park
72. Woodbury Park
73. Wurster Park

City of Ann Arbor parks within DDA District:

1. Farmers Market
2. Kempf House
3. Liberty Plaza
4. Sculpture Plaza

Friday, August 8, 2014

New Jersey mulls bill raising state smoking age to 21

Lighting up may soon join chugging as a rite of passage in New Jersey, as the Garden State weighs a first-in-the-nation statewide ban on the sale of tobacco products to those under 21 years of age. In a move being closely watched by other states, New Jersey is well on its way to the ban, with a bill having passed the state Senate and headed to the state General Assembly this fall.

Many local and city governments have passed laws to increase the minimum smoking age to 19 or 21, but there hasn’t been a statewide bill yet. Antismoking activists say the idea is gaining momentum and could even put pressure on Washington to join the movement.

“On the local and state level, we think that each of the states will move towards this,” said Karen Blumenfeld, executive director of the Global Advisors Smokefree Policy (GASP). “We would greatly appreciate if the federal government would take the next step and ban smoking in all public places and workplaces.”

Laws prohibiting the sale of tobacco products to those 19 and younger have been implemented in local communities and states like New Jersey, Alabama, Alaska and Utah, as well the District of Columbia. The minimum age in every other state is 18. Backers cite public health risks to the young people who are susceptible to becoming addicted, as well as the likelihood that buyers between 18 and 20 will share their purchases with even younger friends.

This move comes in the face of an expanding e-cigarette and marijuana industry, which has cut into traditional tobacco use among the young. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cigarette use among the young has declined significantly: 15.7 percent had smoked cigarettes at least once 30 days before the survey in 2013, down from 36.4 percent in 1997.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has given no indication whether he will sign the bill. The bill covers cigarettes made of tobacco, smokeless tobacco and any electronic smoking devices. Merchants face fines of up to $1,000 for multiple offenses.

“There was a sizable majority of legislators wanting this to happen,” said Ms. Blumenfeld. “Isn’t that the job of policymakers to pass policy to save lives?”

New Jersey state Sens. Richard Codey and Joseph Vitale, the Democratic co-sponsors of the bill, argue that raising the age to 21 saves lives.

“This is a highly addictive and deadly product,” said Mr. Vitale. “We have to do all we can to minimize the risks for young people.”

“We care about them, and we don’t want them to die.”

But critics say the measure infringes on consumer choice and is just the latest misguided “nanny state” legislation.

“It’s a halfhearted attempt to bolster the argument that public health trumps consumer rights,” said Sal Risalvato, executive director of the New Jersey Gasoline-Convenience-Automotive Association (NJGCA). “There’s no way that they are going to stop somebody under 21 years of age from smoking.”

People who love to smoke cigarettes, say that the best way to save time and money is to buy cigarettes online from http://www.dotcigarettes.com/

News source: http://www.washingtontimes.com/